Analysis On Students’ Scientific Literacy of Newton’s Law and Motion System in Living Things

Indah Slamet Budiarti*, Tanta Tanta

Abstract


The 21st century skills focus on scientific literacy competences in various urban and rural areas, one of which is Papua. Scientific literacy has competences to identifying scientific problems, explaining scientific phenomena, and utilizing scientific findings to solve problems. The purpose of this study was to determine the science literacy competences of IPA class VIII students of SMPN 5 Jayapura. Scientific literacy is competencies to understanding science, communicating science, and applying scientific conceptual to solve problems. A descriptive qualitative approach is used as this type of research. This research was conducted at SMPN 5 Jayapura. The sample selection used purposive sampling technique. There were 33 students who became respondents and teste in this study. The research instruments were documentation, observation, tests and interviews. The average percentage of competency aspects with indicators of identifying scientific problems, explaining scientific phenomena, and utilizing scientific findings is below 80%. The average percentage of aspects of knowledge about the concept of motion, with sub-concepts of regular motion, force, and Newton's laws is below 90%. The average percentage of human, animal and plant movement systems is below 70%. The highest score, average, median, mode, and lowest score of the cognitive scores of students' scientific literacy abilities were 100; 68.33; 75; 80; and 30. The scientific literacy competences of grade 8 students of SMPN 5 Jayapura are still low, which is shown in terms of the percentage of competence and is classified as moderate for the knowledge aspect. The conclusion of this study is that the scientific literacy competences of students at SMPN 5 Jayapura are in the sufficient category.


Keywords


Scientific literacy, Newton’s law, motion, force

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Momani, F.N.N. 2016. Assessing the development of scientific literacy among Undergraduates College of Education. Journal of Studies in Education, 6(2):199-206.

Anggraini, R., Herlina, K., & Nyeneng, I.D.P. 2018. Desain LKPD berbasis scientific approach untuk melatih keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa pada materi suhu dan perubahannya: penelitian pendahuluan. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 6(2):21-29.

Anunah, J.O.A. & Hodge, S.R. 2005. Secondary physical education teachers’ beliefs and practices in teaching students with severe disabilities: a descriptive analysis. The High School Journal, 89(2):40–54.

Aryani, W.D., Suhendi, E., Suyana, I., Samsudin, A., & Kaniawati, I. 2019. Effectiveness of implementation interactive conceptual instruction (ICI) with computer simulation to overcome students’ misconceptions about newton’s law of gravitation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280:52011.

Kheirabadi, M.A. & Mirzaei, Z. 2019. Descriptive valuation pattern in education and training system: a mixed study. Journal of Humanities Insights, 3(1):7–12.

Behrendt, H., Dahncke, H., Duit, R., Gräber, W., Komorek, M., Kross, A., & Reiska, P. 2001. Research in science education past, present, and future. Springer Science & Business Media.

Bieber, T. & Martens, K. 2011. The OECD PISA study as a soft power in education? Lessons from Switzerland and the US. European Journal of Education, 46(1):101–116.

Bond, D. 1989. In pursuit of chemical literacy: A place for chemical reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 66(2):157-169.

Budiarti, I.S., Lumbu, A., & Sulistiowati, D.W.I. 2013. Pengaruh pendekatan konstruktivisme terhadap hasil belajar siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 11 Jayapura pada pokok bahasan getaran dan gelombang tahun ajaran 2012/2013. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(2):53–62.

Budiarti, I.S, Suparmi, A., Sarwanto, S., & Harjana, H. 2020. Effectiveness of generation, evaluation, and modification-cooperative learning (gem-cl) model selaras bakar batu cultural practice in Papua. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1):14-27.

Budiarti, I.S. 2017. Potensi budaya bakar batu dalam pembelajaran fisika. Prosiding SNPF (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika), 32(1):22–25.

Budiarti, I.S., Suparmi, Sarwanto, & Harjana. 2017. Students’ conceptual understanding consistency of heat and temperature. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 795: 012051.

Bussi, M.G.B., Corni, F., & Mariani, C. 2012. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 16(3):23-19.

Carson, J. 2007. A problem with problem solving: Teaching thinking without teaching knowledge. The Mathematics Educator, 17(2):22-30.

Chang, R., S.N., & Rundgren, C.J. 2017. What are we aiming for? A Delphi study on the development of civic scientific literacy in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(2):224–239.

Chowdhury, T.B.M., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. 2020. Socioscientific Issues within Science Education and their Role in Promoting the Desired Citizenry. Science Education International, 31(2):203–208.

Christie, E.J., Jensen, D.D., Buckley, R.T., Menefee, D.A., Ziegler, K.K., Wood, K.L., & Crawford, R.H. 2012. Prototyping strategies: literature review and identification of critical variables. American Society for Engineering Education.

Council, N. R. 2012. Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.

Crawford, R.H., Wood, K.L., Fowler, M.L., & Norrell, J.L. 1994. An engineering design curriculum for the elementary grades. Journal of Engineering Education, 83(2):172–181.

DeBoer, G.E. 2000. Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(6): 582–601.

Dewi, C.A., Khery, Y., & Erna, M. 2019. An ethnoscience study in chemistry learning to develop scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2):279–287.

Dįnçer, S. 2018. Content analysis in for educational science research: Meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, and descriptive content analysis. Bartin Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1):176–190.

Egan, A., Maguire, R., Christophers, L., & Rooney, B. 2017. Developing creativity in higher education for 21st century learners: A protocol for a scoping review. International Journal of Educational Research, 8(2):21–27.

Eshet, Y. 2004. Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1):93–106.

Forum, W.E. 2015. New vision for education: Unlocking the potential of technology. British Columbia Teachers’ Federation Vancouver, BC.

Gay, G. & Howard, T.C. 2000. Multicultural teacher education for the 21st century. The Teacher Educator, 36(1):1–16.

Glynn, S.M. & Muth, K.D. 1994. Reading and writing to learn science: Achieving scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9):1057–1073.

Hamidi, A. 2004. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Aplikasi Praktis Pembuatan Proposal dan Laporan Penelitian Malang. UMM Press.

Handhika, J., Fatmaryanti, S.D., Khasanah, N., & Budiarti, I.S. 2020. Pembelajaran sains di era akselerasi digital. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=wBXmDwAAQBAJ

Harlen, W. & Qualter, A. 2004. The teaching of science in primary schools. David Fulton Publishers.

Himawan, N.A. & Winarti, W. 2018. The Strategy of Metacognition to Improve Problem Solving Competency in Kinetic Theory of Gases. Edusains, 10(2):265–274.

Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. 2007. The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11):1347–1362.

Istyadji, M. 2007. Penerapan Paduan Model Pembelajaran Siklus belajar dengan Kooperatif GI Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Proses dan hasil Belajar Siswa SMA. PPs Universitas Negeri Malang. Jawa Timur.

Johnstone, M., & Lee, E. 2014. Branded: International education and 21st-century Canadian immigration, education policy, and the welfare state. International Social Work, 57(3): 209–221.

Juanda, A., Kartimi, K., Indriani, D., & Nasrudin, D. 2020. Kelas Kita based blended learning: biology learning model to improve student activities, attitudes, and achievements. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 8(2):187–202.

Karademir, E. & Ulucinar, U. 2017. Examining the relationship between middle school students’ critical reading skills, scientific literacy competences and attitudes: A structural equation modeling. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 3(1):29–39.

Kaya, V.H. & Elster, D. 2018. German students’ environmental literacy in science education based on PISA Data. Science Education International, 29(2):75–87.

Kurniawan, Y. 2018. Investigation of the misconception in Newton II law. Jurnal Pena Sains, 5(1):34-42.

Lederman, N.G. 2006. Syntax of nature of science within inquiry and science instruction. In Scientific inquiry and nature of science. Springer. pp.301–317.

Loeb, S., Dynarski, S., McFarland, D., Morris, P., Reardon, S., & Reber, S. 2017. Descriptive analysis in education: a guide for researchers. NCEE 2017-4023. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

Mason, L.E. 2017. The significance of dewey’s democracy and education for 21st-century education. Education and Culture, 33(1):41–57.

Millar, R. 1998. Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. Http://Www. Kcl. Ac. Uk/Content/1/C6/01/32/03/B2000. Pdf.

Mulyatiningsih, E. & Nuryanto, A. 2014. Metode penelitian terapan bidang pendidikan.

Naimah, J., Winarni, D.S., & Widiyawati, Y. 2019. Pengembangan game edukasi science adventure untuk meningkatkan keterampilanpemecahan masalah siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 7(2):91–100.

Nurdin, N. 2019. Urgensi literasi sains dalam meningkatkan kompetensi widyaiswara pai bdk aceh di era millenial. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 7(1):55–63.

OECD. 2014. PISA 2012 results: Creative problem solving: Students’ skills in tackling real‐life problems. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, 1(5):1–252.

Olsen, R.V., Prenzel, M., & Martin, R. 2011. Interest in science: A many‐faceted picture painted by data from the OECD PISA study. Taylor & Francis.

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. 2003. Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9):1049–1079.

Piaget, J. 2003. Part I: Cognitive Development in Children--Piaget Development and Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(2):40-51.

Pipeleers, G., Demeulenaere, B., Jonkers, I., Spaepen, P., Van der Perre, G., Spaepen, A., Swevers, J., & De Schutter, J. 2008. Dynamic simulation of human motion: numerically efficient inclusion of muscle physiology by convex optimization. Optimization and Engineering, 9(3):213-225.

Prasetya, C., Gani, A., & Sulastri, S. 2019. Pengembangan lembar kerja peserta didik berbasis inkuiri terbimbing pada materi hidrolisis garam untuk meningkatkan literasi sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Kournal of Science Education), 7(1):34–41.

Prastika, M.D., Wati, M., & Suyidno, S. 2019. The effectiveness of problem-based learning in improving students scientific literacy competences and scientific attitudes. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 7(3):194-204.

Pratiwi, S., Prahani, B.K., Suryanti, S., & Jatmiko, B. 2019. The effectiveness of PO2E2W learning model on natural science learning to improve problem solving skills of primary school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3):32017, 123-130.

Ratcliffe, M. & Millar, R. 2009. Teaching for understanding of science in context: Evidence from the pilot trials of the twenty first century science courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8):945–959.

Riduwan, M.B.A. 2010. Metode dan teknik menyusun tesis. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Roberts, D.A. 2013. Scientific literacy/science literacy. In Handbook of research on science education. Routledge. pp.743–794.

Rosana, D., Widodo, E., Setyaningsih, W., & Warno, D.S. 2020. Developing assessment instruments of PISA model to measure students ’ problem-solving skills and scientific literacy in junior high schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 8(2):292–305.

Rychen, D.S. & Salganik, L.H. 2003. Key competencies for a successful life and well-functioning society. Hogrefe Publishing.

Sadhu, S. & Laksono, E.W. 2018. Development and validation of an integrated assessment for measuring critical thinking and chemical literacy in chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3):557–572.

Sari, R., Lestari, S., & Budiarti, M. 2020. Analisis program gerakan literasi sekolah dalam menumbuhkan minat baca. Prosiding Konferensi Ilmiah Dasar, 2:345–350.

Seethal, K. & Menaka, B. 2019. Digitalisation Of Education In 21ST Century: A Boon Or Bane. Higher Education, 43:196.

Shwartz, Y., Ben‐Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. 2005. The importance of involving high‐school chemistry teachers in the process of defining the operational meaning of ‘chemical literacy.’ International Journal of Science Education, 27(3):323–344.

Soh, T.M.T., Arsad, N.M., & Osman, K. 2010. The relationship of 21st century skills on students’ attitude and perception towards physics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7:546–554.

Sugiyono, D. 2010. Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suryanti, D P., Suroso, S., & Yustinus, Y. 2018. Penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe make a match berbantuan media puzzle untuk meningkatkan keaktifan dan hasil belajar IPS siswa kelas 4 SD Negeri dukuh 02 Salatiga tahun pelajaran 2017/2018. Naturalistic: Jurnal Kajian Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 2(2):216–230.

Toharudin, U., Hendrawati, S., & Rustaman, A. 2011. Membangun literasi sains peserta didik. Bandung: Humaniora.

Valdmann, A., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. 2020. Defining teacher ownership: a science education case study to determine categories of teacher ownership. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(4):659–674.

Vieira, R.M. & Tenreiro-Vieira, C. 2016. Fostering scientific literacy and critical thinking in elementary science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4):659–680.

Webb, P. & Mayaba, N. 2010. The effect of an integrated strategies approach to promoting scientific literacy on grade 6 and 7 learners’ general literacy skills. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(3):34–49.

Yerushalmi, E. & Eylon, B.S. 2004. Assessing reflection on practice: a problem solving perspective. AIP Conference Proceedings, 720(1):153–156.

Zatsiorsky, V.M. & Zaciorskij, V.M. 2002. Kinetics of human motion. Human Kinetics.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i1.18470

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Indah Slamet Budiarti, Tanta Tanta

View JPSI Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.